
Spoiler Alert - (If you have not watched the documentary, you may want to skip this paragraph)
A key part of the documentary is the settlement. Due to the second arrest, Mr. Avery settles for 400.000 dollars so that he can afford a defense team. He would have a multi-million dollar settlement, however his arrest forced his hand to settle for less.
Without the settlement, Mr. Avery would have been given little attention from the media. His connection to the innocence project helped to bolster attention to both projects. While watching things unfold, one has to wonder, how many people do not get the benefit of the doubt that money gave Mr. Avery. Most of our citizenry has to rely on a public defender, which the documentary shows is practically worthless.
The documentary provides an interesting examination of Public Defenders. The problem for public defenders is quite simple. Public defenders do not have the resources that the prosecution team will be able to access. This leaves the client of a public defender vulnerable. In fact, some public defenders may have conversations with the DA without their client knowing that a plea bargain is in the works. A very dangerous precedent for people in poverty. You get the feeling this happens more often than people realize.
Money makes all the difference. When you do have money, you can analyze the evidence and mount an argument for your defense. The documentary clearly demonstrates this by allowing you insight into multiple trials. The trial of the 16 year old was very telling. The lawyers that were public defenders were outplayed by the judicial system. The young man never had a chance, because the public defender had very little to rely on to proved the innocence of their client.
Making a Murderer provides an interesting look into the inequities of our judicial system. A system that needs reforming and a return to Constitutional principles that a man/woman is presumed innocent and it is up to the prosecutor to prove without a shadow of a doubt that someone is guilty. There is a blurred line between prosecuting the right person versus who the state thinks did the crime.
No comments:
Post a Comment